↓ Skip to main content

Homophobia and Communal Coping for HIV Risk Management Among Gay Men in Relationships

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Homophobia and Communal Coping for HIV Risk Management Among Gay Men in Relationships
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10508-014-0417-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Courtney Stachowski, Rob Stephenson

Abstract

Men who have sex with men (MSM) remain disproportionately affected by the HIV epidemic in the US and estimates suggest that one to two-thirds of new infections occur among main partners. Previous research has focused on individual MSM and their risk for HIV, yet couples' ability to manage risk has been largely understudied. In particular, the role that homophobia plays in shaping the ability of gay male couples to cope with HIV risk is currently understudied. A sample of 447 gay/bisexual men with main partners was taken from a 2011 survey of gay and bisexual men in Atlanta. Linear regression models were fitted for three couples' coping outcome scales (outcome efficacy, couple efficacy, communal coping) and included indicators of homophobia (internalized homophobia and homophobic discrimination). Findings indicate that reporting of increased levels of internalized homophobia were consistently associated with decreased outcome measures of couples' coping ability regarding risk management. The results highlight the role that homophobia plays in gay male couples' relationships and HIV risk, extending the existing literature in the field of same-sex relationships as influenced by homophobia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 31%
Social Sciences 10 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 14 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2015.
All research outputs
#16,430,428
of 25,169,746 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#3,059
of 3,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,371
of 363,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#45
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,169,746 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.