You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding the Concept of Perineology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s001920200060 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Beco, J. Mouchel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 29 | 27% |
| Engineering | 23 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#888
of 2,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,816
of 322,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#23
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.