↓ Skip to main content

The effect of pre-cueing on spatial attention across perception and action

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of pre-cueing on spatial attention across perception and action
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, November 2017
DOI 10.3758/s13423-017-1397-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Moran M. Israel, Pierre Jolicoeur, Asher Cohen

Abstract

It is well established that processes of perception and action interact. A key question concerns the role of attention in the interaction between perception-action processes. We tested the hypothesis that spatial attention is shared by perception and action. We created a dual-task paradigm: In one task, spatial information is relevant for perception (spatial-input task) but not for action, and in a second task, spatial information is relevant for action (spatial-output task) but not for perception. We used endogenous pre-cueing, with two between-subjects conditions: In one condition the cue was predictive only for the target location in the spatial-input task; in a second condition the cue was predictive only for the location of the response in the spatial-output task. In both conditions, the cueing equally affected both tasks, regardless of the information conveyed by the cue. This finding directly supports the shared input-output attention hypothesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 5 24%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%