↓ Skip to main content

S-(+)-Ketamin Kreislaufinteraktionen bei totaler intravenöser Anästhesie und Analgosedierung

Overview of attention for article published in Die Anaesthesiologie, December 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
S-(+)-Ketamin Kreislaufinteraktionen bei totaler intravenöser Anästhesie und Analgosedierung
Published in
Die Anaesthesiologie, December 1997
DOI 10.1007/s001010050510
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. A. Adams

Abstract

General cardiovascular properties of ketamine: "In vitro", ketamine has moderate negative inotropic effects. "In vivo", a significant central sympathomimetic action with consecutive hemodynamic effects is dominant. The sympathomimetic potency of ketamine is one of the most significant pharmacological features of the substance with direct clinical implications. Monoanaesthesia with S-(+)-ketamine: After application of racemic ketamine or S(+)-ketamine as well, identic and significant increases in plasma catecholamines, arterial pressure and heart rate are observed. This outstanding sympathomimetic action is beneficial in induction of patients with shock or asthmatic state. TIVA and analgosedation with S-(+)-ketamine and midazolam: The sympathomimetic effect of S(+)-ketamine, and racemic ketamine as well, is mitigated by midazolam. Nevertheless, significant increases in heart rate and arteriel pressure might be observed. Clinical use of the combination is common in short procedures like reposition maneuvers. Of greater importance is the use for analgosedation in patients with cardiovascular instability, particularly in patients with exogenous catecholamine demand. TIVA and analgosedation with S-(+)-ketamine and propofol: When S(+)-ketamine is combined with propofol, the sympatholytic effects of propofol are counteracted by S(+)-ketamine, and stable hemodynamic conditions are presented. This combination seems useful for TIVA in patients with hypotonic dysregulation or endocrine deficits like hypothyreosis and adrenal insufficiency. Furthermore, analgosedation with S(+)-ketamine and propofol is advantageous, when rapid recovery is necessary and negative circulatory effects should be avoided.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Die Anaesthesiologie
#126
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,620
of 94,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Anaesthesiologie
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.