↓ Skip to main content

Why male orangutans do not kill infants

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why male orangutans do not kill infants
Published in
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, July 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00265-009-0827-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lydia H. Beaudrot, Sonya M. Kahlenberg, Andrew J. Marshall

Abstract

Infanticide is widespread among mammals, is particularly common in primates, and has been shown to be an adaptive male strategy under certain conditions. Although no infanticides in wild orangutans have been reported to date, several authors have suggested that infanticide has been an important selection pressure influencing orangutan behavior and the evolution of orangutan social systems. In this paper, we critically assess this suggestion. We begin by investigating whether wild orangutans have been studied for a sufficiently long period that we might reasonably expect to have detected infanticide if it occurs. We consider whether orangutan females exhibit counterstrategies typically employed by other mammalian females. We also assess the hypothesis that orangutan females form special bonds with particular "protector males" to guard against infanticide. Lastly, we discuss socioecological reasons why orangutan males may not benefit from infanticide. We conclude that there is limited evidence for female counterstrategies and little support for the protector male hypothesis. Aspects of orangutan paternity certainty, lactational amenorrhea, and ranging behavior may explain why infanticide is not a strategy regularly employed by orangutan males on Sumatra or Borneo.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 133 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 18%
Student > Bachelor 22 15%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 15 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 52%
Environmental Science 16 11%
Social Sciences 12 8%
Psychology 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 19 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,463,061
of 24,510,033 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#1,057
of 3,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,801
of 115,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,510,033 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.