↓ Skip to main content

Pathogenesis of degenerative retinopathies induced by thioridazine and other antipsychotics: a dopamine hypothesis

Overview of attention for article published in Documenta Ophthalmologica, July 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pathogenesis of degenerative retinopathies induced by thioridazine and other antipsychotics: a dopamine hypothesis
Published in
Documenta Ophthalmologica, July 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1015768114192
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pantaleo Fornaro, Giovanni Calabria, Guido Corallo, Giovanni B. Picotti

Abstract

Thioridazine and other antipsychotics (neuroleptics, dopaminergic antagonists) can cause degenerative retinopathies with histological, electrophysiological and symptomatological features similar to those of primary retinitis pigmentosa. It was formerly suggested that these retinopathies are due to drug absorption by melanin of the eye which damages the choriocapillaris first and subsequently the photoreceptors and the retinal pigment epithelium. An alternative explanation of the still unclear mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of thioridazine and other phenothiazines retinopathies has underlined the role of the drug effects on the activity of some retinal enzymatic systems which can lead to retinal dystrophy. More recent data on the complex role of dopamine (DA) and of its receptor subtypes in the retina has provided evidence that the D2 family of DA receptors, in particular the D4 receptor, is involved in the control of the synthesis of melatonin, a factor that has been shown to regulate several aspects of retinal physiology and to increase photoreceptor susceptibility to be damaged by light. Based on this knowledge, as well as on clinical data and on pharmacological considerations concerning the differences recently shown to exist among the various antipsychotics as regards their affinity for the DA receptor subtypes, we hypothesize that neuroleptic induced blockade of retinal D2/D4 receptors is among the initial events of these drug-induced degenerative retinopathies. Clinicians should be aware of the retinotoxic effects not only of thioridazine and some others phenothiazines, but also of those possibly caused by other typical and atypical antipsychotics. By evaluating the retinal status and function before and during the treatment of psychiatric patients, it should be possible to choose more accurately the safest drugs, particularly when treating predisposed subjects.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Professor 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#76
of 485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,876
of 47,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 485 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them