You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Testing the Mill hypothesis of fiscal illusion
|
---|---|
Published in |
Public Choice, January 2005
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11127-005-3992-4 |
Authors |
Rupert Sausgruber, Jean-Robert Tyran |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
China | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 47 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 27% |
Researcher | 8 | 17% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 10% |
Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
Professor | 4 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 8 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 24 | 50% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 10% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Philosophy | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 14 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,005,630
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Public Choice
#228
of 1,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,681
of 151,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Choice
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.