↓ Skip to main content

Atmospheric tides

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, October 1969
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Atmospheric tides
Published in
Space Science Reviews, October 1969
DOI 10.1007/bf00171584
Authors

RichardS. Lindzen, Sydney Chapman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 30%
Researcher 8 24%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 39%
Physics and Astronomy 6 18%
Engineering 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#464
of 1,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#598
of 2,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 2,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them