You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, March 1994
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01065371 |
| Authors |
Colin F. Camerer, Teck-Hua Ho |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 163 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 34% |
| Researcher | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 30 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 51 | 30% |
| Psychology | 29 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 20 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 4% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Unknown | 38 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,928,626
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
#76
of 445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#853
of 21,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them