You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The choice of foraging methods of the Brown Dipper,Cinclus pallasii (Aves: Cinclidae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethology, December 1990
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02350282 |
| Authors |
Kazuhiro Eguchi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 38% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 13% |
| Researcher | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 4 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 38% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,620,956
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethology
#180
of 508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,040
of 60,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them