↓ Skip to main content

Spatial memory in the grey mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus)

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatial memory in the grey mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus)
Published in
Animal Cognition, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10071-009-0219-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mia-Lana Lührs, Melanie Dammhahn, Peter M. Kappeler, Claudia Fichtel

Abstract

Wild animals face the challenge of locating feeding sites distributed across broad spatial and temporal scales. Spatial memory allows animals to find a goal, such as a productive feeding patch, even when there are no goal-specific sensory cues available. Because there is little experimental information on learning and memory capabilities in free-ranging primates, the aim of this study was to test whether grey mouse lemurs (Microcebus murinus), as short-term dietary specialists, rely on spatial memory in relocating productive feeding sites. In addition, we asked what kind of spatial representation might underlie their orientation in their natural environment. Using an experimental approach, we set eight radio-collared grey mouse lemurs a memory task by confronting them with two different spatial patterns of baited and non-baited artificial feeding stations under exclusion of sensory cues. Positional data were recorded by focal animal observations within a grid system of small foot trails. A change in the baiting pattern revealed that grey mouse lemurs primarily used spatial cues to relocate baited feeding stations and that they were able to rapidly learn a new spatial arrangement. Spatially concentrated, non-random movements revealed preliminary evidence for a route-based restriction in mouse lemur space; during a subsequent release experiment, however, we found high travel efficiency in directed movements. We therefore propose that mouse lemur spatial memory is based on some kind of mental representation that is more detailed than a route-based network map.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Brazil 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Unknown 221 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 23%
Student > Master 53 23%
Student > Bachelor 31 13%
Researcher 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 28 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 31%
Computer Science 57 24%
Engineering 14 6%
Psychology 13 6%
Environmental Science 11 5%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 32 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2016.
All research outputs
#6,412,605
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#875
of 1,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,004
of 93,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.