↓ Skip to main content

Seasonal and diurnal use of eight different call types by Indian peafowl (Pavo cristatus)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethology, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Seasonal and diurnal use of eight different call types by Indian peafowl (Pavo cristatus)
Published in
Journal of Ethology, February 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10164-007-0078-4
Authors

Mariko Takahashi, Toshikazu Hasegawa

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 30%
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 53%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 10%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 1 3%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2015.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethology
#180
of 500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,972
of 157,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethology
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.