↓ Skip to main content

Deep Learning in Neuroradiology

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Neuroradiology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
70 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
509 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deep Learning in Neuroradiology
Published in
American Journal of Neuroradiology, February 2018
DOI 10.3174/ajnr.a5543
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Zaharchuk, E. Gong, M. Wintermark, D. Rubin, C.P. Langlotz

Abstract

Deep learning is a form of machine learning using a convolutional neural network architecture that shows tremendous promise for imaging applications. It is increasingly being adapted from its original demonstration in computer vision applications to medical imaging. Because of the high volume and wealth of multimodal imaging information acquired in typical studies, neuroradiology is poised to be an early adopter of deep learning. Compelling deep learning research applications have been demonstrated, and their use is likely to grow rapidly. This review article describes the reasons, outlines the basic methods used to train and test deep learning models, and presents a brief overview of current and potential clinical applications with an emphasis on how they are likely to change future neuroradiology practice. Facility with these methods among neuroimaging researchers and clinicians will be important to channel and harness the vast potential of this new method.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 509 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 509 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 12%
Researcher 62 12%
Student > Master 49 10%
Other 38 7%
Student > Bachelor 36 7%
Other 99 19%
Unknown 162 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 19%
Computer Science 57 11%
Engineering 53 10%
Neuroscience 28 6%
Physics and Astronomy 12 2%
Other 59 12%
Unknown 201 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2022.
All research outputs
#762,093
of 25,192,722 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#52
of 5,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,080
of 452,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#2
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,192,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.