↓ Skip to main content

Feature structure of Romance clitics

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, November 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 294)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
240 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Feature structure of Romance clitics
Published in
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, November 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00992853
Authors

Eulàlia Bonet

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Uganda 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 40 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 30%
Researcher 8 18%
Lecturer 4 9%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 34 77%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Psychology 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2008.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
#46
of 294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,339
of 25,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 294 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 25,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them