↓ Skip to main content

Electron transfer dissociation of peptide anions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
10 patents
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
215 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Electron transfer dissociation of peptide anions
Published in
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, June 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.jasms.2005.01.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua J. Coon, Jeffrey Shabanowitz, Donald F. Hunt, John E. P. Syka

Abstract

Ion/ion reactions of multiply deprotonated peptide anions with xenon radical cations result in electron abstraction to generate charge-reduced peptide anions containing a free-radical site. Peptide backbone cleavage then occurs by hydrogen radical abstraction from a backbone amide N to facilitate cleavage of the adjacent C-C bond, thereby producing a- and x-type product ions. Introduction of free-radical sites to multiply charged peptides allows access to new fragmentation pathways that are otherwise too costly (e.g., lowers activation energies). Further, ion/ion chemistry, namely electron transfer reactions, presents a rapid and efficient means of generating odd-electron multiply charged peptides; these reactions can be used for studying gas-phase chemistries and for peptide sequence analysis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 127 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 28%
Researcher 30 23%
Professor 11 8%
Student > Master 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 15 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 60 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 9%
Unspecified 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 21 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,863,997
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#131
of 3,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,127
of 68,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,834 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.