↓ Skip to main content

Health Implications of Climate Change: a Review of the Literature About the Perception of the Public and Health Professionals

Overview of attention for article published in Current Environmental Health Reports, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 360)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
18 X users

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health Implications of Climate Change: a Review of the Literature About the Perception of the Public and Health Professionals
Published in
Current Environmental Health Reports, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40572-018-0190-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Hathaway, Edward W. Maibach

Abstract

Through a systematic search of English language peer-reviewed studies, we assess how health professionals and the public, worldwide, perceive the health implications of climate change. Among health professionals, perception that climate change is harming health appears to be high, although self-assessed knowledge is low, and perceived need to learn more is high. Among the public, few North Americans can list any health impacts of climate change, or who is at risk, but appear to view climate change as harmful to health. Among vulnerable publics in Asia and Africa, awareness of increasing health harms due to specific changing climatic conditions is high. Americans across the political and climate change opinion spectra appear receptive to information about the health aspects of climate change, although findings are mixed. Health professionals feel the need to learn more, and the public appears open to learning more, about the health consequences of climate change.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 247 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 10%
Researcher 22 9%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Other 13 5%
Other 37 15%
Unknown 87 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 13%
Environmental Science 27 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 9%
Social Sciences 16 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Other 46 19%
Unknown 97 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2023.
All research outputs
#551,304
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Current Environmental Health Reports
#28
of 360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,092
of 450,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Environmental Health Reports
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.