↓ Skip to main content

Time Costs for Genetic Counseling in Preconception Carrier Screening with Genome Sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetic Counseling, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Time Costs for Genetic Counseling in Preconception Carrier Screening with Genome Sequencing
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10897-017-0205-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frances L. Lynch, Patricia Himes, Marian J. Gilmore, Elissa M. Morris, Jennifer L. Schneider, Tia L. Kauffman, Elizabeth Shuster, Jacob A. Reiss, John F. Dickerson, Michael C. Leo, James V. Davis, Carmit K. McMullen, Benjamin S. Wilfond, Katrina A.B. Goddard

Abstract

Advances in technology and the promise of personalized health care are driving greater use of genome sequencing (GS) for a variety of clinical scenarios. As health systems consider adopting GS, they need to understand the impact of GS on the organization and cost of care. While research has documented a dramatic decrease in the cost of sequencing and interpreting GS, few studies have examined how GS impacts genetic counseling workloads. This study examined the time needed to provide genetic counseling for GS in the context of preconception carrier screening. Genetic counselors prospectively reported on the time spent in the results disclosure process with 107 study participants who were part of the NextGen study. We found that the median time for results disclosure was 64 min (ranged from 5 to 229 min). Preparation work was the most time-consuming activity. Qualitative data from journal entries, debrief interviews with genetic counselors, and detailed case conference notes provided information on factors influencing time for results disclosure and implications for practice. Results suggest that expanded carrier screening could require significant increases in genetic counseling time, unless we are able to generate new resources to reduce preparation work or develop other strategies such as the creation of new models to deliver this type of service.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 15%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 17 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 20 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2018.
All research outputs
#18,587,406
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#956
of 1,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#329,481
of 439,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#38
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.