↓ Skip to main content

Nutraceutical-definition and introduction

Overview of attention for article published in The AAPS Journal, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
901 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nutraceutical-definition and introduction
Published in
The AAPS Journal, July 2015
DOI 10.1208/ps050325
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ekta K. Kalra

Abstract

Dr Stephen DeFelice coined the term "Nutraceutical" from "Nutrition" and "Pharmaceutical" in 1989. The term nutraceutical is being commonly used in marketing but has no regulatory definition. An attempt to redefine nutraceuticals and functional foods is made in this article. The proposed definitions can help distinguish between functional foods, nutraceuticals, and dietary supplements. The advantages and disadvantages of nutraceuticals are also briefly discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 901 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 891 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 158 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 121 13%
Student > Bachelor 119 13%
Researcher 86 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 54 6%
Other 122 14%
Unknown 241 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 169 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 80 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 74 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 74 8%
Chemistry 59 7%
Other 143 16%
Unknown 302 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,318,942
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from The AAPS Journal
#61
of 1,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,873
of 277,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AAPS Journal
#1
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.