↓ Skip to main content

Assigning product ions from complex MS/MS spectra: The importance of mass uncertainty and resolving power

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, February 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assigning product ions from complex MS/MS spectra: The importance of mass uncertainty and resolving power
Published in
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, February 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.jasms.2004.10.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lekha Sleno, Dietrich A. Volmer, Alan G. Marshall

Abstract

This study offers a unique insight into the mass accuracy and resolving power requirements in MS/MS analyses of complex product ion spectra. In the examples presented here, accurate mass assignments were often difficult because of multiple isobaric interferences and centroid mass shifts. The question then arose whether the resolving power of a medium-resolution quadrupole time-of flight (QqTOF) is sufficient or high-resolution Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR) is required for unambiguous assignments of elemental compositions. For the comparison, two paralytic shellfish poisons (PSP), saxitoxin (STX) and neosaxitoxin (NEO), with molecular weights of 299 and 315 g x mol(-1), respectively, were chosen because of the high peak density in their MS/MS spectra. The assessment of QqTOF collision-induced dissociation spectra and FT-ICR infrared multiphoton dissociation spectra revealed that several intrinsic dissociation pathways leading to isobaric fragment ions could not be resolved with the QqTOF instrument and required FT-ICR to distinguish very close mass differences. The second major source of interferences was M + 1 species originating from coactivated 13C12Cc-1 ion contributions of the protonated molecules of the PSPs. The problem in QqTOF MS results from internal mass calibration when the MH+ ions of analyte and mass calibrant are activated at the same time in the collision or trapping cell. Although FT-ICR MS readily resolved these interfering species, the QqTOF did not provide resolving power >20,000 (full width at half maximum) required to separate most isobaric species. We were able to develop a semi-internal QqTOF calibration technique that activated only the isolated 12C isotope species of the protonated molecules, thus reducing the M + 1 interferences significantly. In terms of overall automated elemental formulas assignment, FT-ICR MS achieved the first formula hit for 100% of the product ions, whereas the QqTOF MS hit rate was only 56 and 65% for STX and NEO product ions, respectively. External mass calibration from commercial FT-ICR and QqTOF instruments gave similar results.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
France 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 81 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 24%
Student > Master 11 12%
Professor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 6 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 43 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 8 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#1,226
of 3,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,965
of 158,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,833 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.