You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differential sensitivity to regional-scale drought in six central US grasslands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-015-3233-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alan K. Knapp, Charles J. W. Carroll, Elsie M. Denton, Kimberly J. La Pierre, Scott L. Collins, Melinda D. Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 237 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 23% |
| Researcher | 52 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Unknown | 38 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 97 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 62 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 54 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2015.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#3,906
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,339
of 366,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#41
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.