↓ Skip to main content

Neuronal apoptosis in the brainstem medulla of sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI), and the importance of standardized SUDI classification

Overview of attention for article published in Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuronal apoptosis in the brainstem medulla of sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI), and the importance of standardized SUDI classification
Published in
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12024-018-9954-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalie Ambrose, Karen A. Waters, Michael L. Rodriguez, Kendall Bailey, Rita Machaalani

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the neuronal expression of apoptotic markers in the rostral medulla of a newly characterized dataset of sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI), and to determine the impact of diagnostic groupings on these findings and whether they pertain to the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. Immunohistochemical staining was quantified to determine the percentage of neurons positive for active caspase-9 (specific to the intrinsic apoptotic pathway), active caspase-3 (common to the intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathways) and Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated dUTP nick-end labelling (TUNEL) (labels DNA fragmentation) in nine nuclei of the rostral medulla. Expression was compared between groups of SUDI infants where the cause of death was initially classified by a forensic pathologist or subsequently after reclassification by an expert panel using the San Diego Criteria. 68 SUDI infants were studied and originally classified as explained SUDI (n = 12), Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) (n = 27) and undetermined (n = 29). Reclassification resulted in a decrease in the number of explained SUDI cases to 7 and a decrease in the number of undetermined cases to 4, with a corresponding increase in the number of SIDS cases to 57 (8 SIDS I; 49 SIDS II). The expression of apoptotic markers was similar in explained SUDI and SIDS I infants. However, TUNEL expression was greater in the cuneate (p < 0.001), vestibular (p = 0.01) and hypoglossal (p < 0.001) nuclei and active caspase-3 expression was lower in the arcuate nucleus (p = 0.037) in SIDS II compared to explained Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy (eSUDI) infants. Compared to SIDS I infants, SIDS II infants had greater TUNEL expression in the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus (p < 0.01) and greater active caspase-9 expression in the medial and spinal vestibular nuclei (p = <0.01). Changes in apoptotic expression predominated in SIDS II infants. We postulate that these are due to a combination of contributing risk factors including the presence of an upper respiratory tract infection and bed-sharing/co-sleeping. The absence of changes in active caspase-9 expression compared to eSUDI indicates that the intrinsic apoptotic pathway is not upregulated in SIDS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 14 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 15 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2018.
All research outputs
#16,454,538
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#407
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,224
of 334,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#8
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.