You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A dual-mode mobile phone microscope using the onboard camera flash and ambient light
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-018-21543-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Orth, E. R. Wilson, J. G. Thompson, B. C. Gibson |
| Abstract |
Mobile phone microscopes are a natural platform for point-of-care imaging, but current solutions require an externally powered illumination source, thereby adding bulk and cost. We present a mobile phone microscope that uses the internal flash or sunlight as the illumination source, thereby reducing complexity whilst maintaining functionality and performance. The microscope is capable of both brightfield and darkfield imaging modes, enabling microscopic visualisation of samples ranging from plant to mammalian cells. We describe the microscope design principles, assembly process, and demonstrate its imaging capabilities through the visualisation of unlabelled cell nuclei to observing the motility of cattle sperm and zooplankton. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 115 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 21 | 18% |
| Spain | 19 | 17% |
| United States | 11 | 10% |
| Mexico | 4 | 3% |
| France | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 39 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 82 | 71% |
| Scientists | 29 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 148 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 19% |
| Unknown | 34 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 29 | 20% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 11 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 42 | 28% |
| Unknown | 36 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 314. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2022.
All research outputs
#110,669
of 25,807,758 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#1,411
of 143,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,688
of 345,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#45
of 4,276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,807,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.