You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Hyperkalemic periodic paralysis and paramyotonia congenita – A novel sodium channel mutation –
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Neurology, November 2001
|
DOI | 10.1007/s004150170059 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shiho Okuda, Fumio Kanda, Keisuke Nishimoto, Ryogen Sasaki, Kazuo Chihara |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 33% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 17% |
Researcher | 1 | 17% |
Other | 1 | 17% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 17% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 50% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 33% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,774
of 4,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,456
of 44,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.