You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Two flavonol glycosides from Liparis bootanensis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Natural Medicines, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11418-018-1189-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shuai Huang, Run Wu, Feng Gao, Chunying Li, Xianli Zhou |
| Abstract |
Two new flavonol glycosides, bootanenside I and II (1 and 2), along with ten known compounds (3-12), were isolated from whole plant of Liparis bootanensis Griff. Their structures were elucidated on the basis of extensive spectroscopic analyses, including high-resolution electrospray-ionization mass spectrometry (HR-ESIMS) and one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The cytotoxicity of the compounds was investigated against HCT116 human cancer cell line, revealing that none of them possessed considerable cytotoxic activity. Bioassays of the new metabolites showed that compounds 1 and 2 displayed moderate in vitro antiinflammatory activity by inhibiting expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) protein in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophage cells. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 27% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2018.
All research outputs
#14,839,807
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Natural Medicines
#210
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,661
of 330,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Natural Medicines
#11
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.