↓ Skip to main content

A Heuristic Framework of Spatial Ability: a Review and Synthesis of Spatial Factor Literature to Support its Translation into STEM Education

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Psychology Review, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
277 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Heuristic Framework of Spatial Ability: a Review and Synthesis of Spatial Factor Literature to Support its Translation into STEM Education
Published in
Educational Psychology Review, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10648-018-9432-z
Authors

Jeffrey Buckley, Niall Seery, Donal Canty

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 277 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 16%
Lecturer 28 10%
Student > Master 28 10%
Researcher 20 7%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Other 53 19%
Unknown 84 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 33 12%
Psychology 31 11%
Mathematics 23 8%
Engineering 14 5%
Arts and Humanities 11 4%
Other 72 26%
Unknown 93 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,019,394
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from Educational Psychology Review
#157
of 653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,712
of 332,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Psychology Review
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.