You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Analgetika-Intoleranz
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
HNO, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00106-008-1701-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
U. Förster, H. Olze |
| Abstract |
The clinical manifestation of analgesic intolerance (AI) is frequently associated with symptoms examined by ear-nose-throat (ENT) specialists. The prevalence of AI is reported in the literature to be 0.6-2.5%. Even though there are no concluding results concerning its pathogenesis, an altered arachidonic acid metabolism is most likely the underlying pathomechanism. The symptoms include chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, asthma, gastrointestinal ulcers, angioedema, and urticaria. Clinical reactions after ingestion of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory-drugs (NSAIDs) are often obvious in the progress of disease. In order to initiate early therapy and therefore prevent the progress of disease, the diagnosis of AI should occur before the complete picture of AI is obvious. Adaptive desensitization is currently the single causal therapy. Frequency of endonasal revision surgery is reduced after desensitization; severe asthma and reactions after ingestion of NSAIDs are avoided. ENT specialists are particularly in a key position for early detection of AI. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from HNO
#68
of 431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,443
of 81,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HNO
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.