↓ Skip to main content

Sex Differences in Autism Spectrum Disorder: a Review

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
239 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
402 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sex Differences in Autism Spectrum Disorder: a Review
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11920-018-0874-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah L. Ferri, Ted Abel, Edward S. Brodkin

Abstract

Neurodevelopmental disorders disproportionately affect males. The mechanisms underlying male vulnerability or female protection are not known and remain understudied. Determining the processes involved is crucial to understanding the etiology and advancing treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders. Here, we review current findings and theories that contribute to male preponderance of neurodevelopmental disorders, with a focus on autism. Recent work on the biological basis of the male preponderance of autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders includes discussion of a higher genetic burden in females and sex-specific gene mutations or epigenetic changes that differentially confer risk to males or protection to females. Other mechanisms discussed are sex chromosome and sex hormone involvement. Specifically, fetal testosterone is involved in many aspects of development and may interact with neurotransmitter, neuropeptide, or immune pathways to contribute to male vulnerability. Finally, the possibilities of female underdiagnosis and a multi-hit hypothesis are discussed. This review highlights current theories of male bias in developmental disorders. Topics include environmental, genetic, and epigenetic mechanisms; theories of sex chromosomes, hormones, neuroendocrine, and immune function; underdiagnosis of females; and a multi-hit hypothesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 402 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 402 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 56 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 11%
Student > Master 45 11%
Researcher 35 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 5%
Other 58 14%
Unknown 143 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 68 17%
Neuroscience 56 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 4%
Other 43 11%
Unknown 160 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,061,747
of 25,971,360 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#353
of 1,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,106
of 350,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#8
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,971,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.