↓ Skip to main content

Does the MIND diet decrease depression risk? A comparison with Mediterranean diet in the SUN cohort

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does the MIND diet decrease depression risk? A comparison with Mediterranean diet in the SUN cohort
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00394-018-1653-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ujué Fresán, Maira Bes-Rastrollo, Gina Segovia-Siapco, Almudena Sanchez-Villegas, Francisca Lahortiga, Pedro-Antonio de la Rosa, Miguel-Angel Martínez-Gonzalez

Abstract

To prospectively evaluate the association of the Mediterranean-DASH diet intervention for neurodegenerative delay (MIND) diet and the Mediterranean diet (and their components), and depression risk. We followed-up (median 10.4 years) 15,980 adults initially free of depression at baseline or in the first 2 years of follow-up. Food consumption was measured at baseline through a validated food-frequency questionnaire, and was used to compute adherence to the MIND and the Mediterranean diets. Relationships between these two diets and incident depression were assessed through Cox regression models. We identified 666 cases of incident depression. Comparing the highest versus the lowest quartiles of adherence, we found no association of the MIND diet and incident depression. This relation was statistically significant for the Mediterranean diet {hazard ratio (HR) 0.75, [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.61, 0.94]; p < 0.01}, although with departure from linearity. A reduced depression risk was associated with higher consumption of both fruits and nuts [HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.69, 0.96); p = 0.02], moderate nuts consumption [HR 0.77 (95% CI 0.64, 0.93); p = 0.01], and avoidance of fast/fried food [HR 0.63 (95% CI 0.41, 0.96); p = 0.03]. The Mediterranean diet was associated with reduced depression risk, but we found no evidence of such an association for the MIND diet.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 177 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 16%
Student > Master 26 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Researcher 9 5%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 65 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 15%
Neuroscience 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 71 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#499,184
of 25,392,205 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#139
of 2,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,410
of 339,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#5
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.