You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Principle and analytical applications of resonance lonization mass spectrometry
|
---|---|
Published in |
Microchimica Acta, May 1989
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf01244676 |
Authors |
Hubertus Rimke, G�nter Herrmann, Marita Mang, Christoph M�hleck, Joachim Riegel, Peter Sattelberger, Norbert Trautmann, Friedhelm Ames, Hans -J�rgen Kluge, Ernst -Wilhelm Otten, Dieter Rehklau, Wolfgang Ruster, Franz Scheerer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 1 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
Researcher | 1 | 20% |
Other | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 2 | 40% |
Decision Sciences | 1 | 20% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,547,578
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Microchimica Acta
#192
of 1,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,106
of 14,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microchimica Acta
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,401 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them