↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the Issues Surrounding Clinical Exome Sequencing in the Prenatal Setting

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetic Counseling, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring the Issues Surrounding Clinical Exome Sequencing in the Prenatal Setting
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10897-018-0245-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Swetha Narayanan, Bruce Blumberg, Marla L. Clayman, Vivian Pan, Catherine Wicklund

Abstract

Exome sequencing is a clinical diagnostic test offered primarily for children and adults with suspected genetic conditions. The purpose of this study was to explore issues related to exome sequencing in a reproductive clinical setting. This was a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Participants were professionals drawn from four key stakeholder groups-healthcare providers, laboratory/industry, ethics, and government. Transcribed interviews were analyzed for emergent themes. Most participants saw potential clinical utility in offering prenatal exome sequencing for diagnostic purposes as opposed to screening. Participants expressed similar challenges already encountered with using exome sequencing in a pediatric setting, such as difficulty interpreting results and voiced many of the same concerns posed by prenatal testing, such as adequate pretest counseling. While previously reported issues and challenges were mentioned, participants agreed those difficulties are anticipated to be much greater with prenatal exome sequencing because of the scope of testing and the option for pregnancy decision-making. The results of this study help gain a better understanding of the implications of using exome sequencing in a prenatal setting. Development of guidelines is also warranted to aid clinical practice and laboratory standards for reporting prenatal results.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 17 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 20 44%