↓ Skip to main content

Optimization of hydrolysis conditions for the mannooligosaccharides copra meal hydrolysate production

Overview of attention for article published in 3 Biotech, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimization of hydrolysis conditions for the mannooligosaccharides copra meal hydrolysate production
Published in
3 Biotech, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13205-018-1178-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jurairat Rungruangsaphakun, Suttipun Keawsompong

Abstract

Copra meal is a good source of galactomannan and itsmannooligosaccharides have prebiotic properties. However, limited data are available concerning the ideal requirements for mannan hydrolysis. Thus, optimum hydrolysis conditions for the production of oligosaccharides from copra meal hydrolysate were investigated using response surface methodology. Model validation provided good agreement between experimental results and predicted responses. Maximum oligosaccharide of 14.41 ± 0.09 mg/ml (20 ml) was obtained at an enzyme concentration of 16.52 U/ml, substrate concentration 15% and reaction time 12 h. On a larger scale, this increased to 15.76 ± 0.04 mg/ml (200 ml) and 16.89 mg/ml (2000 ml). Defatted copra meal hydrolysate promoted the growth of beneficial bacteria as lactobacilli and bifidobacteria, while inhibiting pathogensSalmonellaserovar Enteritidis S003,Escherichia coliE010,Staphylococcus aureusTISTR 029 andShigella dysenteriaeDMST 1511. Higher yield of oligosaccharides under optimum conditions indicated the potential of this method for production of mannooligosaccharides from copra meal hydrolysate on an industrial scale.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Master 3 10%
Unspecified 3 10%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 10 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 16%
Unspecified 3 10%
Chemistry 3 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,494,712
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from 3 Biotech
#406
of 1,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,391
of 332,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from 3 Biotech
#13
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,250 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.