You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Randomized Prospective Study Comparing Acquisition of Laparoscopic Skills in Three‐Dimensional (3D) vs. Two‐Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopy
|
---|---|
Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00268-014-2674-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
B. Alaraimi, W. El Bakbak, S. Sarker, S. Makkiyah, A. Al‐Marzouq, R. Goriparthi, A. Bouhelal, V. Quan, B. Patel |
Abstract |
We aimed to compare the performance of novices with three-dimensional (3D) versus two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy using Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) tasks. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 19% |
Researcher | 7 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
Professor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 21 | 30% |
Unknown | 12 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 50% |
Engineering | 7 | 10% |
Psychology | 3 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 19 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2015.
All research outputs
#14,088,092
of 25,070,356 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#2,492
of 4,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,794
of 231,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#20
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,070,356 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.