↓ Skip to main content

The development of the theory of summable divergent series from 1880 to 1925

Overview of attention for article published in Archive for History of Exact Sciences, January 1973
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
23 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The development of the theory of summable divergent series from 1880 to 1925
Published in
Archive for History of Exact Sciences, January 1973
DOI 10.1007/bf00343405
Authors

John Tucciarone

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Professor 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 2 33%
Mathematics 2 33%
Engineering 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Archive for History of Exact Sciences
#70
of 313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,408
of 17,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archive for History of Exact Sciences
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 313 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them