↓ Skip to main content

Improving sudden cardiac death risk stratification by evaluating electrocardiographic measures of global electrical heterogeneity and clinical outcomes among patients with implantable cardioverter-defi…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving sudden cardiac death risk stratification by evaluating electrocardiographic measures of global electrical heterogeneity and clinical outcomes among patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: rationale and design for a retrospective, multicenter, cohort study
Published in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10840-018-0342-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan W. Waks, Christopher Hamilton, Saumya Das, Ashkan Ehdaie, Jessica Minnier, Sanjiv Narayan, Mark Niebauer, Merritt Raitt, Christine Tompkins, Niraj Varma, Sumeet Chugh, Larisa G. Tereshchenko

Abstract

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) improve survival of systolic heart failure (HF) patients who are at risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). We recently showed that electrocardiographic (ECG) global electrical heterogeneity (GEH) is independently associated with SCD in the community-dwelling cohort and developed GEH SCD risk score. The Global Electrical Heterogeneity and Clinical Outcomes (GEHCO) study is a retrospective multicenter cohort designed with two goals: (1) validate an independent association of ECG GEH with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias and appropriate ICD therapies and (2) validate GEH ECG risk score for prediction of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias and appropriate ICD therapies in systolic HF patients with primary prevention ICD. All records of primary prevention ICD recipients with available data for analysis are eligible for inclusion. Records of ICD implantation in patients with inherited channelopathies and cardiomyopathies are excluded. Raw digital 12-lead pre-implant ECGs will be used to measure GEH (spatial QRST angle, spatial ventricular gradient magnitude, azimuth, and elevation, and sum absolute QRST integral). The primary endpoint is defined as a sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia event with appropriate ICD therapy. All-cause death without preceding sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia with appropriate ICD therapy will serve as a primary competing outcome. The study will draw data from the academic medical centers. We describe the study protocol of the first multicenter retrospective cohort of primary prevention ICD patients with recorded at baseline digital 12-lead ECG. Findings from this study will inform future trials to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from primary prevention ICD. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03210883.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Other 7 20%
Unknown 12 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Materials Science 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 14 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2018.
All research outputs
#16,462,378
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
#204
of 343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,876
of 355,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 343 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them