You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Towards digital reconstruction of fossil crania and brain morphology
|
---|---|
Published in |
Anthropological Science, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1537/ase.141109 |
Authors |
NAOMICHI OGIHARA, HIDEKI AMANO, TAKEO KIKUCHI, YUSUKE MORITA, KUNIHIRO HASEGAWA, TAKANORI KOCHIYAMA, HIROKI C. TANABE |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 23 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 25% |
Researcher | 4 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
Professor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 38% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 13% |
Psychology | 2 | 8% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 8% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2015.
All research outputs
#4,812,180
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Anthropological Science
#16
of 274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,663
of 362,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anthropological Science
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 274 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them