↓ Skip to main content

A SALL4 zinc finger missense mutation predicted to result in increased DNA binding affinity is associated with cranial midline defects and mild features of Okihiro syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A SALL4 zinc finger missense mutation predicted to result in increased DNA binding affinity is associated with cranial midline defects and mild features of Okihiro syndrome
Published in
Human Genetics, January 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00439-005-0124-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Miertus, Wiktor Borozdin, Vladimir Frecer, Giorgio Tonini, Sara Bertok, Antonio Amoroso, Stanislav Miertus, Jürgen Kohlhase

Abstract

Truncating mutations of the gene SALL4 on chromosome 20q13.13-13.2 cause Okihiro and acro-renal-ocular syndromes. Pathogenic missense mutations within the SALL4 or SALL1 genes have not yet been reported, raising the question which phenotypic features would be associated with them. Here we describe the first missense mutation within the SALL4 gene. The mutation results in an exchange of a highly conserved zinc-coordinating Histidine crucial for zinc finger (ZF) structure within a C2H2 double ZF domain to an Arginine. Molecular modeling predicts that this exchange does not result in a loss of zinc ion binding but leads to an increased DNA-binding affinity of the domain. The index patient shows mild features of Okihiro syndrome, but in addition cranial midline defects (pituitary hypoplasia and single central incisor). This finding illustrates that the phenotypic and functional effects of SALL4 missense mutations are difficult to predict, and that other SALL4 missense mutations might lead to phenotypes not overlapping with Okihiro syndrome.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Portugal 1 3%
Unknown 33 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 17%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 7 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 14%
Chemistry 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#933
of 2,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,100
of 154,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.