↓ Skip to main content

Amniotic membrane extract differentially regulates human peripheral blood T cell subsets, monocyte subpopulations and myeloid dendritic cells

Overview of attention for article published in Cell and Tissue Research, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Amniotic membrane extract differentially regulates human peripheral blood T cell subsets, monocyte subpopulations and myeloid dendritic cells
Published in
Cell and Tissue Research, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00441-018-2822-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paula Laranjeira, Marta Duque, Martin Vojtek, Maria J. Inácio, Isabel Silva, Ana C. Mamede, Mafalda Laranjo, Susana Pedreiro, Maria J. Carvalho, Paulo Moura, Ana M. Abrantes, Cláudio J. Maia, Pedro Domingues, Rosário Domingues, António Martinho, Maria F. Botelho, Hélder Trindade, Artur Paiva

Abstract

The discovery of the immunoregulatory potential of human amniotic membrane (hAM) propelled several studies focusing on its application for the treatment of immunological disorders. However, there is little information regarding the effects of hAM on distinct activation and differentiation stages of immune cells. Here, we aim to investigate the effect of human amniotic membrane extract (hAME) on the pattern of cytokine production by T cells, monocytes and myeloid dendritic cells (mDCs). For this purpose, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from eight healthy individuals were stimulated in vitro in the presence or absence of hAME. Mitogen-induced proliferation of PBMCs and cytokine production among the distinct T cell functional compartments, monocyte subpopulations and mDCs were evaluated. hAME displayed an anti-proliferative effect and decreased the frequency of T cells producing tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α, interferon (IFN)γ and interleukin (IL)-2, for all T cell functional compartments. The frequency of IL-17 and IL-9-producing T cells was also reduced. The inhibition of mRNA expression of granzyme B, perforin and NKG2D by CD8+T cells and γδ T cells and the augment of FoxP3 and IL-10 in CD4+T cells and IL-10 in regulatory T cells were also observed. Furthermore, hAME inhibited IFNγ-induced protein (IP)-10 expression by classical and non-classical monocytes, without hampering the production of TNFα and IL-6 by monocytes and mDCs. These results suggest that hAME exerts an anti-inflammatory effect on T cells, still at a different extent for distinct T cell functional compartments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Engineering 3 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 9 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2018.
All research outputs
#13,540,321
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Research
#1,266
of 2,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,831
of 332,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Research
#12
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.