↓ Skip to main content

Biomechanical properties of lightweight versus heavyweight meshes for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and their impact on recurrence rates

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biomechanical properties of lightweight versus heavyweight meshes for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and their impact on recurrence rates
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, April 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00464-008-9936-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Hollinsky, Simone Sandberg, Thomas Koch, Sabine Seidler

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 24%
Student > Master 9 18%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 32%
Engineering 15 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Materials Science 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2010.
All research outputs
#7,549,344
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,704
of 6,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,012
of 79,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,111 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.