You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Recycling process of WC-Co cermets by hydrothermal treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, October 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10853-005-4407-0 |
| Authors |
T. Kojima, T. Shimizu, R. Sasai, H. Itoh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 18% |
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 9 | 26% |
| Engineering | 7 | 21% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2017.
All research outputs
#7,550,194
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#940
of 4,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,692
of 59,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#7
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.