You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fatal swine acute diarrhoea syndrome caused by an HKU2-related coronavirus of bat origin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-018-0010-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peng Zhou, Hang Fan, Tian Lan, Xing-Lou Yang, Wei-Feng Shi, Wei Zhang, Yan Zhu, Ya-Wei Zhang, Qing-Mei Xie, Shailendra Mani, Xiao-Shuang Zheng, Bei Li, Jin-Man Li, Hua Guo, Guang-Qian Pei, Xiao-Ping An, Jun-Wei Chen, Ling Zhou, Kai-Jie Mai, Zi-Xian Wu, Di Li, Danielle E. Anderson, Li-Biao Zhang, Shi-Yue Li, Zhi-Qiang Mi, Tong-Tong He, Feng Cong, Peng-Ju Guo, Ren Huang, Yun Luo, Xiang-Ling Liu, Jing Chen, Yong Huang, Qiang Sun, Xiang-Li-Lan Zhang, Yuan-Yuan Wang, Shao-Zhen Xing, Yan-Shan Chen, Yuan Sun, Juan Li, Peter Daszak, Lin-Fa Wang, Zheng-Li Shi, Yi-Gang Tong, Jing-Yun Ma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,118 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 136 | 12% |
| Japan | 115 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 22 | 2% |
| Australia | 18 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 12 | 1% |
| Canada | 11 | <1% |
| France | 9 | <1% |
| Spain | 8 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 87 | 8% |
| Unknown | 694 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1005 | 90% |
| Scientists | 78 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 16 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 763 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 763 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 115 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 106 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 90 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 64 | 8% |
| Other | 53 | 7% |
| Other | 140 | 18% |
| Unknown | 195 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 81 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 79 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 70 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 56 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 53 | 7% |
| Other | 186 | 24% |
| Unknown | 238 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1763. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,957
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#629
of 98,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96
of 344,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#11
of 927 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 927 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.