You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cationic polyacrylamides enhance rates of starch and cellulose saccharification
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biotechnology Techniques, June 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10529-009-0053-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
John T. Reye, Kendra Maxwell, Swati Rao, Jian Lu, Sujit Banerjee |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
China | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 9 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 40% |
Researcher | 3 | 30% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 10% |
Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 40% |
Materials Science | 3 | 30% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
Chemistry | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2018.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology Techniques
#264
of 2,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,224
of 123,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology Techniques
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.