You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An In Vivo Approach to Structure Activity Relationship Analysis of Peptide Ligands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pharmaceutical Research, March 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11095-007-9238-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaomin Fan, Ruben Venegas, Robert Fey, Henri van der Heyde, Mark A. Bernard, Elias Lazarides, Catherine M. Woods |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 15% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2011.
All research outputs
#7,552,525
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#1,023
of 2,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,369
of 77,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#27
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.