↓ Skip to main content

Serum Circulating MicroRNAs as Biomarkers of Osteoporotic Fracture

Overview of attention for article published in Calcified Tissue International, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Serum Circulating MicroRNAs as Biomarkers of Osteoporotic Fracture
Published in
Calcified Tissue International, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00223-015-0036-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Layla Panach, Damián Mifsut, Juan J. Tarín, Antonio Cano, Miguel Ángel García-Pérez

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a common skeletal disorder characterized by increased risk of bone fracture (BF) due to fragility. BFs, particularly hip fracture, are a major concern in health care because of the associated morbidity and mortality, mainly in the elderly. Lately the involvement of epigenetic mechanisms in the pathophysiology of many diseases has been recognized. In this context, the identification of microRNAs (miRNAs) specific to BF should represent a substantial step forward in diagnostics and therapeutics. The present study aimed to identify specific miRNAs in osteoporotic BF patients compared to those in osteoarthritic controls. In the profiling stage, total RNA was extracted from serum, two pools were prepared, and then retro-transcribed in triplicate. Levels of 179 serum miRNAs were analyzed by real-time PCR, and 42 of them showed significance (P < 0.05), and 12 passed the false discovery rate test for multiple comparisons. Six miRNAs were selected for the replication stage and individually analyzed in sera from 15 BF patients and 12 controls. Results showed that 3 miRNAs (miR-122-5p, miR-125b-5p, and miR-21-5p) were valuable upregulated biomarkers in BF with respect to controls and, significantly, their levels were not affected by hemolysis. For miR-21-5p, the difference detected between groups was independent of age (P = 0.005) and its levels correlated to those of CTx (r = 0.76; P < 0.00001), a marker of bone resorption. In conclusion, several miRNAs may be biomarkers of BF, particularly miR-21-5p. Further studies are needed in order to better characterize the levels of these miRNAs in other bone diseases and to elucidate the mechanism involved in the association of these three miRNAs with osteoporotic BF.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Other 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 11%
Engineering 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 26 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,760,740
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from Calcified Tissue International
#309
of 1,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,721
of 263,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Calcified Tissue International
#7
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.