↓ Skip to main content

Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: importance of the postural change

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
221 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: importance of the postural change
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, September 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00134-008-1293-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julien Jabot, Jean-Louis Teboul, Christian Richard, Xavier Monnet

Abstract

For predicting fluid responsiveness by passive leg raising (PLR), the lower limbs can be elevated at 45 degrees either from the 45 degrees semi-recumbent position (PLR(SEMIREC)) or from the supine position (PLR(SUPINE)). PLR(SUPINE) could have a lower hemodynamic impact than PLR(SEMIREC) since it should not recruit the splanchnic venous reservoir.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 3 2%
Spain 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mozambique 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 186 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 14%
Student > Postgraduate 26 13%
Other 22 11%
Student > Master 18 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 50 26%
Unknown 37 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 120 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Engineering 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 44 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,838
of 4,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,841
of 74,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#13
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.