You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reproducible protocols for metagenomic analysis of human faecal phageomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40168-018-0446-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrey N. Shkoporov, Feargal J. Ryan, Lorraine A. Draper, Amanda Forde, Stephen R. Stockdale, Karen M. Daly, Siobhan A. McDonnell, James A. Nolan, Thomas D.S. Sutton, Marion Dalmasso, Angela McCann, R. Paul Ross, Colin Hill |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 6 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 14% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Israel | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 57% |
| Scientists | 11 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 304 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 21% |
| Researcher | 44 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 12% |
| Unknown | 85 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 74 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 37 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 8% |
| Unknown | 99 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,284,617
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#413
of 1,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,870
of 344,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#18
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,792 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.