You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effectiveness of Multisystemic Therapy (MST): A meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Psychology Review, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.06.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Trudy van der Stouwe, Jessica J. Asscher, Geert Jan J.M. Stams, Maja Deković, Peter H. van der Laan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Norway | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 289 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 11% |
| Researcher | 29 | 10% |
| Other | 38 | 13% |
| Unknown | 76 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 139 | 47% |
| Social Sciences | 35 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 4% |
| Unknown | 84 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,643,272
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Psychology Review
#446
of 1,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,904
of 246,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Psychology Review
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.