↓ Skip to main content

Age-related performance of human subjects on saccadic eye movement tasks

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, August 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
510 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
354 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Age-related performance of human subjects on saccadic eye movement tasks
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, August 1998
DOI 10.1007/s002210050473
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. P. Munoz, J. R. Broughton, J. E. Goldring, I. T. Armstrong

Abstract

We measured saccadic eye movements in 168 normal human subjects, ranging in age from 5 to 79 years, to determine age-related changes in saccadic task performance. Subjects were instructed to look either toward (pro-saccade task) or away from (anti-saccade task) an eccentric target under different conditions of fixation. We quantified the percentage of direction errors, the time to onset of the eye movement (saccadic reaction time: SRT), and the metrics and dynamics of the movement itself (amplitude, peak velocity, duration) for subjects in different age groups. Young children (5-8 years of age) had slow SRTs, great intra-subject variance in SRT, and the most direction errors in the anti-saccade task. Young adults (20-30 years of age) typically had the fastest SRTs and lowest intra-subject variance in SRT. Elderly subjects (60-79 years of age) had slower SRTs and longer duration saccades than other subject groups. These results demonstrate very strong age-related effects in subject performance, which may reflect different stages of normal development and degeneration in the nervous system. We attribute the dramatic improvement in performance in the anti-saccade task that occurs between the ages of 5-15 years to delayed maturation of the frontal lobes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 354 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 6 2%
Belgium 4 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 331 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 87 25%
Researcher 52 15%
Student > Master 52 15%
Student > Bachelor 25 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 25 7%
Other 67 19%
Unknown 46 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 96 27%
Neuroscience 57 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 8%
Engineering 20 6%
Other 50 14%
Unknown 60 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2013.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#494
of 3,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,792
of 31,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.