↓ Skip to main content

Systematics and evolution of Carex sects. Spirostachyae and Elatae (Cyperaceae)

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Systematics and Evolution, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematics and evolution of Carex sects. Spirostachyae and Elatae (Cyperaceae)
Published in
Plant Systematics and Evolution, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00606-009-0156-x
Authors

Marcial Escudero, Modesto Luceño

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 16%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Professor 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Environmental Science 5 11%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,862,539
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#146
of 945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,964
of 109,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 945 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.