↓ Skip to main content

An evaluation of the locomotor stimulating action of ethanol in rats and mice

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, December 1981
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An evaluation of the locomotor stimulating action of ethanol in rats and mice
Published in
Psychopharmacology, December 1981
DOI 10.1007/bf00435856
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerald D. Frye, George R. Breese

Abstract

The locomotor activity of groups of three CD-1 female mice was increased by 1.0 and 2.0 g/kg ethanol, IP, was decreased during the first hour and increased during the second hour by 3.0 and 4.0 g/kg, and was decreased by 5.0 g/kg. The dose (2.0 g/kg) that caused the greatest increase in locomotor activity did not impair motor coordination, measured by the height of aerial righting in mice. Tests after oral administration of ethanol showed that the increase in locomotor activity of mice was not due to peritoneal irritation. The same dose (2.0 g/kg) did not increase the locomotor activity of C57BL/6J mice. Ethanol (0.1 to 3.0 g/kg) had no effect or decreased the locomotor activity of individual male Sprague-Dawley rats. These findings suggest that biological differences in strains and species of laboratory rodents contribute to the apparent variability of locomotor stimulation caused by ethanol. The presence or absence of an ethanol-induced increase in locomotor activity was not dependent on the sex or number of mice or rats tested. Intertrial-interval crossing by rats acquiring or performing an active avoidance task in a shuttle box was increased by ethanol. This action was dependent on the presentation of electric foot shock. Apomorphine (0.25 and 2.5 mg/kg) and fenmetozole (7.5 and 15.0 mg/kg) failed to inhibit the ethanol-induced increase in intertrial-interval crossing by rats, although these drugs have been shown previously to antagonize the ethanol-induced increase in the activity of mice ethanol treatment. The ethanol-induced increases in the spontaneous locomotor activity of CD-1 mice in photocell activity monitors and in intertrial-interval crosses in rats in a shuttle box task thus do not appear to share a common mechanism.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 30 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 19%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 7 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 19%
Psychology 4 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2023.
All research outputs
#4,953,162
of 23,749,054 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#1,274
of 5,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,966
of 31,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,749,054 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.