↓ Skip to main content

Retrieval inhibition from part-set cuing: A persisting enigma in memory research

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, November 1984
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
220 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retrieval inhibition from part-set cuing: A persisting enigma in memory research
Published in
Memory & Cognition, November 1984
DOI 10.3758/bf03213342
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raymond S. Nickerson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 43 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 58%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Computer Science 2 4%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 8 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,655,010
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#494
of 1,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,694
of 10,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them